|
BLUEPRINT FOR SURVIVAL 2
by Michael Menduno & Billy Deans
Though technical training standards
have been well established by the American Nitrox Divers, Inc.
(ANDI), International Association of Nitrox & Technical Divers
(IANTD), Professional Scuba Association (PSA), and Technical Diving
International (TDI) and are continuing to evolve, there is currently
no set of agreed upon operational guidelines, i.e. guidelines
used to direct diving operations, similar to those developed by
the professional and commercial diving communities.
Originally published in aquaCORPS
Journal N6/Computing (93JUN), the guidelines listed below were
compiled by Capt. Billy Deans/Key West Diver and Michael Menduno/aquaCORPS
with the help of many individuals throughout the community in
response to the number of technical-level accidents that were
occurring during that period. They were based on what we perceived
as the "best practices" from the technical diving community drawing
heavily on accident analysis techniques developed by the cave
diving community, and were offered as a starting point for the
development of "community consensus" guidelines for technical
divers.
Now two years later, in light of
the tremendous growth in technical diving, and with the majority
of the recreational training agencies beginning enriched air nitrox
we felt it was necessary to update and republish these guidelines.
To do that we have contacted leaders from around the community
including the heads of the technical training companies asking
for their comments and feedback. These are shown below. As such
this document represents a community perspective which we are
pleased to offer to our readership.
Background
About twelve to fifteen years ago
in response to the then growing number of fatalities, the cave
diving community developed a set of safety principles based on
the then-new tool of "accident analysis." Later refined by pioneer
Sheck Exley and elucidated in his book Basic Cave Diving: A Blueprint
for Survival (Exley, 1979, 1986), accident analysis is a means
to rigorously dissect an accident into its constituent parts with
the goal of determining "what went wrong." Applying this tool
to cave diving, it was discovered that most diving accidents could
usually be attributed to a primary causal factor and typically
one or more contributing factors. What’s more is that these factors
could be boiled down into five basic cave diving safety principles:
be trained, use a continuous guideline to the surface, manage
your gas according to a thirds rule or better, don’t dive deep
(on air), and carry at least three lights. A sixth principle,
known as "Eternal Vigilance," states: "Anyone Can Die At Any Time
On Any Cave Dive." Accident analysis of these resulting safety
procedures have become the cornerstone of cave diving safety ever
since.
Numerous other analyses of sport
diving accidents have been conducted following the early cave
diving work. In 1989, Mano and Shibayama published a study titled
"Aspects of Recent Scuba Diving Accidents" (Mano and Shibayama,
1989), which analyzed 264 fatalities and 319 incidents of compression
illness and arterial gas embolism. According to the authors, over
45% of sport diving fatalities that occurred were due to "reckless
diving" or "lack of technique." Most appear to have been preventable.
In another study, Chowdhury, in affiliation with the National
Underwater Data Center (Chowdhury, 1989) conducted an analysis
of wreck diving accidents. His conclusions were that 73% of the
accidents involving wreck penetration were due to the "lack of
a continuous guideline," while 42% of the fatalities that occurred
external to a wreck were due to "out of gas" emergencies.
In 1990, Exley revisited his earlier
work in a paper published in Underwater Speleology. Based on the
recent trends in accidents, Exley concluded that perhaps too much
emphasis was being placed on the basic cave diving principles
in light of more recent tools and techniques being employed by
cave divers (e.g., mix technology), and that an expanded list
of safety recommendations should be developed.
Exley’s conclusions provided motivation
for the original paper. Our approach was to attempt to identify
and address the factors that could potentially result in diver
injury or death, building on the cave diving safety principles
and practices from the community. The resulting guidelines are
organized into seven categories: Requirements, Training, Gas Supply,
Gas Mix, Decompression, Equipment, and Operations.
Requirements
The generalized requirements for
conducting technical dives were aptly summarized in the form of
the acronym AKTEE. These are:
A Attitude: Why are you doing this?
A proper attitude is essential to conducting technical dives safely.
There is no room for recklessness or machismo.
K Knowledge: Without the proper
knowledge, there are no options when problems occur.
T Training: Skills must become
second nature&endash;a part of muscle memory.
E Experience: Experience is exposure
and environmental specific and takes time to build. Extensive
wreck diving experience does not qualify a diver for cave diving
and visa versa.
E Equipment: Every dive requires
an appropriate set of tools.
Note that the more challenging
the dive and the further the dive goes beyond mainstream sport
diving limits, the more risk the diver must accept. No amount
of training or equipment will completely mitigate this risk.
Training
Technical training is an ongoing
process similar to training for an athletic season or fight training.
Continual practice is the key. Completing a formal course is a
good first step, but is only a starting point. It does not in
itself prepare you to make the dive. Technical diving is a discipline,
not a card.
1. Always be prepared and trained
for the dive you plan to conduct. Perform a risk assessment. Ask
yourself if you, and your partner, meet the AKTEE criteria and
if the dive is worth the risks involved. If the answer is no to
either question, call the dive.
2. Review and practice emergency
procedures frequently so that they become second nature.
Gas Supply
Ensuring adequate gas supply is
the major constraint factor in self-contained diving and represents
the single largest risk factor. In particular, planning and carrying
adequate gas reserves is critical.
3. Always dive an appropriately
redundant breathing system (minimally first and second stage redundancy)
in an overhead environment, or when diving in open water beyond
130 f/ 40 m. Second stage redundancy and a dive partner is an
acceptable redundant system in open water no-stop diving (recreational
diving) to 130 f/40 m in good conditions though an independent
redundant system is recommended for dives deeper than 60 f/18
m and/or in less than ideal conditions.
4. Pre-plan and calculate the gas
required to conduct the dive (Gas requirements = planned consumption
plus required reserves) and dive your plan. Gas calculations should
be based on the most conservative breathing rates of you and your
partner. Always dive your bottom gas using at least the Rule of
Thirds [Turn the dive when one third of your gas is exhausted,
leaving two thirds for the exit and reserve] in an overhead environment,
or a suitable equivalent in open water, depending on the operation.
There should be sufficient reserves for the dive team to exist
safely in the event one diver suffers a "catastrophic" gas loss.
For extended open water dives, the consensus seems to be to reach
your first decompression stop with one third of your bottom gas
remaining.
5. Plan at least a 33% reserve
(1.5 x planned usage) for your decompression gas. Depending on
the operation, decompression cylinders should be equipped with
redundant regulators.
6. When possible, carry all the
gas you will need for the dive unless it can be reliably staged,
depending on the operation and environment. Note that the ability
to reliably stage gas is one of the major differences between
cave and wreck diving. In open water diving the goal is to be
"self-sufficient," to the maximum extent possible. Based on an
analysis of gas logistics, the self-sufficiency "breakeven point"
for extended open water dives appears to be about 250-300 f/77-92
m for a two-person team, depending on the duration of the dive.
Open water dives beyond this require an extensive support team
and effective communications.
Gas Mix
Mix technology is a tool designed
to improve underwater safety and performance when properly applied.
The most critical factor in special mix diving is oxygen management
due to the risk of a CNS toxicity convulsion.
7. Always dive the safest possible
mix(es) for the dive you plan to conduct.
8. Always analyze and label your
gas and regulators before making the dive. Make sure that you
know what you are breathing. Use a contents tag that specifies
the type of gas and maximum operating depth. Any cylinder or regulator
carrying a potentially hyperoxic gas (PO2=1.6+ at any depth during
the dive) should also ideally have "touch ID" capability for zero
visibility conditions (see below).
9. Maintain your PO2s at or below
1.45 atm during the working phase of the dive and anytime more
than light work is being done, boosting oxygen levels to a maximum
of 1.6 atm with care, during resting decompression. The community
standard today is to run travel and bottom mix at about 1.2-1.45
atm, depending on conditions and the operation and PO2s of 1.4
-1.6 atm are generally treated as a caution zone. Take regular
"air breaks, as a safety hedge every 20-25 minutes when breathing
oxygen. " [ If air is not available, the lowest FO2 travel gas
should be used. Some trainers take breaks during the decompression
phase of the dive whenever the CNS index exceeds 80%. Note that
the CNS indices being used today are just guidelines and are not
necessarily supported by hard data. As succinctly summarized by
Terry Billingsley (Hamilton, 1985): "CNS toxicity is like sand
beside the road. If you stay on the road, you won’t get into trouble."]
10. "Just Say No" to nitrox mixes
( like air) beyond about 180-200 f/55-61 m or less, depending
on the operation and environment. In particular, keep equivalent
narcotic depths (END) as shallow as operationally and economically
feasible, preferably 150 f/46 m or less. Note that ANDI limit
s nitrox (air and EAN) exposures to 165 f/ 50 m. PSA allow s very
short "non-working" exposures to 240 f/ 72 m and deeper under
the supervision of two instructors per student.
Decompression
Decompression illness is not an
accident. It happens and will continue to happen as a predictable
part of diving.
11. Always use appropriate and
reliable decompression methods and tools for the dive you’re planning
to conduct and be conservative. Carry bailout tables for gas loss
scenarios.
12. Utilize a hyperoxic mix for
decompression (e.g., oxygen and/or suitable EAN mixes) whenever
possible when conducting a staged decompression exposure. Oxygen
at 10 and 20 f/3 and 6 m stop is preferred in some circles [ Air,
and to a lesser extent EAN mixes, have been regarded as inefficient
at reducing decompression risk (Vann, 1992)], though EAN 80 (80%
O2, 20% N2) has grown in popularity as it is thought to reduce
CNS toxicity risk and can be used at 30 f/ 9 m. Note just as it
is recommended that divers make a "safety stop" on no-stop dives,
some individuals prefer to treat the first (deepest) stop on a
mix dive in the same manner and make a couple minute safety stop
at least 10 f/3 m deeper than required.
13. Limit oxygen decompression
to 20 f/6 m or less (max. PO2=1.6 atm) and use care. The diver
breathing a decompression mix or oxygen should avoid anything
that would increase the likelihood of CNS oxygen toxicity, or
specifically, anything that might raise the diver’s C02 level.
Use an oxygen regulator "guard" to prevent the accidental use
of pure oxygen at depth. Color coding and labeling are insufficient
safeguards.
14. Plan for and always be prepared
to deal with decompression illness (DCI). In particular, have
plenty of oxygen immediately available for treatment after any
diving operation and know how to use it. Many people believe that
low-cost portable on-site chambers will eventually become the
order of the day.
Equipment
Your equipment is your life support
system which allows you to survive in a physiologically hostile
environment. Second only to breathing equipment in importance,
safety lines and a decompression line system are critical to diver
safety.
15. Always use the best possible
equipment that is well-maintained and appropriate for the dive
you plan to conduct and the environment. Redundancy on all essential
subsystems is key. In particular, always carry appropriate emergency
equipment and know how to use it, for example: three lights (overhead
environment), a decompression reel and lift bags (open water),
surface signaling device (open water) and a bail-out bottle when
diving as a team of one.
16. Always use a continuous guideline
when diving in an overhead environment, and/or a decompression
line system when conducting extended and/or deep open water dives.
Note that conducting multi-level extended range open water hangs
without a safety line home can be problematic and difficult. They
require skills and practice to perform without compromising effective
decompression, particularly when using hyperoxic decompression
mixes where depth control is critical.
Note that the original set of guidelines
(1993) included the following point;
If possible, wear breathing equipment
that allows you to survive an underwater convulsion/loss of consciousness,
such as a full face mask system or retaining strap. The use of
full face masks is growing and will likely become a standard for
many technical diving applications due to their many advantages.
In practice this point has not
stood up in the field. Technical divers have not embraced full
face mask technology, nor have FFMs become a standard. This may
change when rebreathers finally hit the market and/or when an
effective mask is developed for technical diving applications.
In the meantime practice the effective and conservative use of
oxygen management in order to avoid a CNS hit.
Operations
Technical dives are operations:
a project or venture involving planning, preparation, organizational
structure, the use of proper equipment, teamwork, competent execution,
and the capacity to respond to emergencies effectively and immediately.
Diver safety is always the first priority. In terms of support
requirements, technical dives fall somewhere in between recreational
dives and commercial operations. Note that all dives are operations.
In the case of traditional "recreational diving," the requirements
are minimal.
17. Pre-plan all aspects of the
dive you intend to conduct and dive your plan. Design your operation
with the goal of being able to provide effective and immediate
assistance to a diver in distress at any point in the dive. In
particularly be prepared for the worst, and always have plenty
of oxygen on hand and know how to use it. Above all, if you’re
not prepared to do it right, don’t do it.
18. Always dive as a team, using
surface support personnel, and when appropriate, in-water support
divers, whenever possible. In particular, designate an operations
manager, who is responsible for overseeing diver safety and record
keeping. Note that the "buddy system" is not reliable enough for
technical diving. A team approach based on individual self-sufficiency
and competency is required, though an team of one is acceptable
in some circumstances, depending on the operation and environment.
Above all, always honor rule number one of team diving: anyone
can "call" the dive at any time for any reason (anyone can die
just as easily).
19. Utilize an effective communications
system between the dive and support team whenever possible. In
the future, wireless communications systems will likely become
commonplace.
20. Stay within your "comfort zone"
during all phases of the dive.
21. Remember: YOU, and YOU ALONE,
are responsible for your own safety. Never permit overconfidence
or peer pressure to allow you to rationalize compromising safety
procedures. It could ruin your whole day.
*Definition: Technical diving is
a discipline that uses special methods and equipment to improve
diver safety and performance enabling the user to conduct dives
in environments and perform tasks beyond the scope of traditional
recreational diving i.e. no-stop dives in an open-water environment
to 130 f/40, Europe; limited decompression dives to 50 m/165 f.
For additional information see "technical Diving 3.1."
Special thanks to the following
individuals and organizations for their interest and input on
this work: Jim Baden, Ed Betts, Bernie Chowdhury, John Crea, Sheck
Exley, Lalo Fiorelli, Steve Gerrard, Kevin Gurr, Dr. R. W. Bill
Hamilton, Lad Handelman, Lamar Hires, Jean-Pierre Imbert, Jim
King, Dick Long, Tom Mount, National Association for Cave Diving,
National Speleological Society/Cave Diving Section, Tony M. Satterfield,
Karl Shreeves, Joel Silverstein, Lee Somers, Dr. Bill Stone, Dr.
Richard Vann, and Hall Watts.
Notes:
Sheck Exley was one of the key
individuals responsible for developing and applying "accident
analysis" to cave diving. His book, Basic Cave Diving: A Blue
Print for Survival (5th ed., 1986) is required reading for all
technical divers. You can obtain a copy from the National Speleological
Society/Cave Diving Section, PO Box 950, Branford, FL 32008.
Betts, E. The application of enriched
air mixtures: the complete SafeAir users guide. Freeport, NY:
American Nitrox Divers Inc., 1992.
Crea, JT. "Oxygen: the princess
of gases," aquaCORPS Journal 3, Winter 1991, p 28-32.
Cash C and G Gentile, S Exley &
M Snyderman. "Beyond machismo," technical Diver 3.2, October 1992,
p 20-24.
Chowdhury, B. Wreck diving analysis:
1970-1990, Report No. URI-SS12-91-22. Kingston, RI: Underwater
Accident Center, University of Rhode Island, 1991.
Exley, S. Basic cave diving: a
blueprint for survival. Branford, FL: Cave Diving Section of the
National Speleological Society, 1979.
Exley, S. "Accident analysis revisited,"
Underwater Speleology, Winter 1990.
Fiorelli, L. Proposed NACD training
standards and procedures. Soquel, CA: L Fiorelli, 1992.
Hamilton, RW. "Nitrogen narcosis:
its significance in modern diving," in Nitrogen narcosis, Hamilton
RW and KW Kinzer, eds, UMS 64WS(NN)4-26-85. Bethesda, MD: Undersea
Medical Society, 1985.
Leonard, MD and L Hires, compilers.
NSS student cave diver workbook. Branford, FL: Cave Diving Section
of the National Speleological Society, 1991.
Mano Y and M Shibayama. "Aspects
of recent scuba diving accidents," Marine Technology Society Journal
23.4, December 1989, pp. 38-41.
Menduno M. "Safety first: an analysis
of recent diving accidents," technicalDiver 3.2, October 1992,
p 3-4, 6-10.
Mount, T. Technical student manual
and workbook. Miami Shores, FL: International Association of Nitrox
& Technical Divers, 1993.
Stone, WC. The wakulla springs
project. Derwood, MD: U.S. Deep Wreck Diving Team, 1989.
Vann, R. "The physiology of mixed
gas diving," talk to the British Sub-Aqua Club, Durham, NC, 1992.
Watts, H. Advanced deep diving
manual. Orlando, FL: Professional Scuba Association, 1991.
|