Table
of Contents
3.11 FOSS
(Fourth Suit Slows Down)
4.3 Forcing
Pass in Competition
5.1.4 1¨
Followed by a Forcing 2M Raise
6.3.1.1 Continuation
after 1N-2§;
2©-2ª
6.3.1.2 Continuation
after Responder’s 3§/¨
6.4.1 2nd
Hand Doubles for Penalties
6.4.1.1 1N-(D)-RD-…;
Next action
6.4.4 Double
or Overcall after 1N-P
8.1 Responses
and Continuation
9.1.1 After
Double of Control-Bids
10.1 Trump
Support Responses and Continuation
10.2 Transfer
Responses and Continuation
10.2.1 Opener
Accepts the Transfer
10.2.2 Opener
Does Not Accept the Transfer
10.3 Other
Responses and Continuation
10.3.1 Continuation
after 1©-1ª
10.3.2 Continuation
after 1ª-3©
10.4.4.1 Michael’s
Cue-Bid (Two-suiter with OM and a Minor)
10.4.4.3 Overcalls/Doubles
after Transfer Responses
10.6 Exceptions
after 1§-1¨; 1©/ª
11.3 Two-Level
Responses Showing 5+M
11.6 Exceptions
after 1§-1¨; 2§/¨
12.1 Responses
and Continuation
12.3 Exceptions
after 1§-1¨; 2©/ª
13.1 Responses
and Continuation
14.1 Responses
and Continuation
14.3 Exceptions
after 1§-1¨; 2N
15.1 Responses
and Continuation
17.3.2 1§-(Overcall
at Any Level)
17.3.4 1§-(Pass)-1¨-(Overcall
at Any Level)
17.3.5 1§-(Pass)-1©+-(Double/Overcall
at Any Level)
18.4.1 Continuation
by hand Type
18.11.1 Continuation
after New Suit, Jump Shift or Double by Responder
18.11.2 Fourth
Hand Bids after Responder Has Shown 6+ Hcp
18.11.3 Continuation
after Responder Has Denied Strength
19.5.1 Responses
and Continuation
Magic
Diamond is a “weak openings system”, based on Carrotti, which is a semi-forcing
“pass system”. Magic Diamond actually sprung from Carrotti when the
administrators decided to make life hard for players who adopted these tactics,
the main idea being to get rid of the hateful pass opening.
Over the
time, Magic Diamond became more and more hairy, in some old-timers’ eyes too
hairy. Magic D-light
is a clean, basic version of Magic Diamond with focus on natural bidding and
few but frequent conventions.
Magic
D-light
|
Sven-Olov
Flodqvist |
tjolpe@telia.com |
|
Tomas Brenning |
tomas@brenning.se |
Magic Diamond
|
Hans Göthe |
hans@gotheit.se |
|
Lars Andersson |
bridgetruck@hotmail.com |
Carrotti
|
Sven-Olov Flodqvist |
tjolpe@telia.com |
Bridge is a
battle between two pairs. Therefore it is at least as important to make it
difficult for the opponents to find their best contracts as finding one’s own.
Most pairs bid better when left alone to open and use their system. For this
reason it is important to take the initiative in the bidding as often as
possible.
Setting
weights on its opening bids and multiplying these with the frequencies you may
measure the aggressiveness of a system. If Pass gets the weight 0, 1§ 1, 1¨ 2, and so on, the aggressiveness of
a standard system will be approximately 1. Since 45% of all bridge hands
contain 8-12 hcp, it is obvious that by opening hands in that interval instead
of, say, 13-16 hcp, the aggressiveness will increase, actually up to about 2.
This is the
theoretical background to all “weak openings systems”. It seems that one may
raise the aggressiveness by simply apply lower limits for the opening bids,
like Acol compared to Culbertson. But such a strategy will create problems in
the constructive bidding, because of the greater span of the openings. That is
why it is a good idea to combine controlled weak openings with artificial and
economical strong ones.
a)
Natural
approach with bilateral exchange of information rather than relay bidding.
b)
Well
and narrowly defined strengths for most openings to enable “fast arrival” as
often as possible. This is especially important at the game level. It is better
to bid games fast and anonymously rather than aim for the theoretically correct
contracts only, using extra rounds of bidding.
c)
Accurate
slam bidding.
d)
Module
approach where the same bidding structures are used over and over again after
different preludes.
e)
In Magic D-light the weaker
hand is very often allowed to speak first. Thus there is no need for the opener
to crowd the bidding. Waiting-bids after transfer responses and general
positive bids are often used rather than natural space-consuming bids, except
for hands with huge direct fits.
As far as
possible we try to stick to the ”official” bridge notation conventions, but, as
a vegetarian friend of mine said when I caught him eating red meat, ”I’m not
religious.”
This is an
area where we have chosen our own path. Since Magic
D-light is not a relay system, the need of specifying exact
distributions is not as great as describing hand patterns.
4441, 5332,
6322 are all notations of hand patterns, not exact distributions, as
many people prefer. If we want to describe an exact pattern we use suit
symbols. A few examples may be in place:
·
4ª4©41 or 1m444 is a three-suited hand
with a minor shortness even though we would prefer to write ”4441 with a minor
shortness” or something along that line.
·
5M332
is a balanced hand with a 5-card major.
·
6¨3§2ª2© is an
exact distribution.
·
The
notation 5431 may be used when referring to an unknown suit.
Lengths of
suits are described in the following manner:
|
1-3© |
1-, 2- or
3-card heart suit. |
|
4+© |
4-card
heart suit or longer. |
|
=4© |
Exactly
4-card heart suit. We use this notation since ”4©”
could be mistaken for a bid. |
We make a
distinction between ”cue-bid” and ”control-bid”. A cue-bid is a bid made in a
suit shown by the opponents. The purpose may be to ask for stopper or send
another type of message over the table. A control-bid (see page 21) is a bid that shows a 1st/2nd
round control and aims at slam.
A ”suit” is
§, ¨, © or ª. A ”strain” is a suit or no-trump.
When it
comes to abbreviations, we try not to use any. The purpose is to keep this
document free from abbreviations since they tend to cloud the contents of the
texts. Nevertheless, sometimes we have to use abbreviations. If we do, they are
very clear and in need of no explanation. J
Even though
the ambition is set on using no abbreviations, sometimes they come in handy
since it is easier to use the abbreviation than writing an essay.
|
M / m |
Major (© or ª) / minor (§ or ¨). |
|
OM / om |
Other major/minor. When one major/minor is the base suit the other major/minor can be
referred to this way. |
|
P/C |
Pass or
Correct. A P/C bid is a bid that asks the partner to pass if a suit has been
found. |
|
SysOn |
System is
On if we, after interference, bid according to our normal methods regardless
of the interference. |
|
NSF |
New Suit
Forcing. |
There are a
few abbreviations we use that are specific to our methods.
Since we
use transfer bids in many situations we need to be able to abbreviate ”transfer
to 2 of a minor” or ”transfer to 3 of an agreed major”. We use the terms TRA2m,
TRA2M, TRA3m, TRA3M, and so on, to refer to bids that transfer to a certain
strain and level. A few examples may be in place:
|
1©-1N/2§ |
TRA2m |
|
1©-2¨ and 1ª-2© |
TRA2M |
|
(1x)-2§; 2ª or (1M)-2¨; 3§ |
TRA3m
(according to our transfer defensive methods called Rubens after Jeff Rubens’
Bridge World articles) |
We have
several well-specified trump support modules. All of those modules are referred
to by a combination of level and strain, i.e. TS2M, TS3m, and so on. This is explained more in detail on page 9.
Depending on the WBF and SBF rules,
the 2©/ª/N openings are not allowed at all
occasions. This has led to two Magic
D-light versions. These two are referred to as ”Brown” and ”Red” where
the former is more artificial than the latter.
The Swedish version ”A” is
equivalent to ”Brown” while ”B” is a mix of the two – 2©/ª (Brown) and 2N (Red) are used.
|
Opening bid |
Neg dbl. through |
1st/2nd hand |
3rd/4th hand |
|
1§ |
3¨ |
· 12-16 hcp, any unbalanced hand including 5M332. · 15-17 hcp, balanced. |
· 12-14 hcp, balanced. · 13-16 hcp, 5+M5+m. |
|
1¨ |
7ª |
· 17+ hcp, unbalanced. · 18+ hcp, balanced. |
ç |
|
1© |
3¨ |
8-11 hcp, 4+©, unbalanced or 5©332, possibly longer minor. |
ç but 11-16 hcp. |
|
1ª |
3¨ |
8-11 hcp, 4+ª, unbalanced or 5ª332, possibly longer minor. |
ç but 11-16 hcp. |
|
1N |
— |
12-14 hcp, balanced. |
ç but 15-17 hcp. |
|
2§ |
3§ |
8-11 hcp, 6+§ or 5+§4+¨, no 4-card major. |