Most of us would argue that
Swedish rural areas are safe sustainable communities.
But how safe they really
are?
New school bus is
vandalised by students between Klimpfjäll and Vilhelmina’. After
this experience, the bus driver is concerned about his own
safety, reported Västerbotten-Kuriren . Another event occurred
in Säter, Dalarna, where a serious crime against the environment
took place, after four males dumped and burned 200 hundred
litres of explosive fluid close to water reservoirs, reported
the Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter . In a more extreme
account, the same newspaper reported the case of a young man who
admitted to kill his wife, dumping her body in an oil tank in
Teckomatorp, in Southern Sweden. In central Sweden, Dalarnas
Tidningar , had an article on a 25 year old male that admitted
to assault physically another male in Vansbro, causing facial
fractures and bleeding. Not far away, in Strömsund, parents
started an association that together with the Police and school
is intended to decrease alcohol consumption among local
teenagers and young people'
These events took place in
2007 in the heart of the Swedish rural areas. Police records show
that a third of sparse populated communities (glesbygd) and nearly a
half of other rural municipalities (tätortsnära landsbygdskommuner)
recorded an increase of reported crimes (counts) between 2000 and
2006 (BRÅ database, 2007). Despite such an increase, a rise in the
number of reported crime does not necessarily mean lack of safety.
In Sweden, crime and fear of crime constitute social issues that
are attracting an increasing amount of attention (BRÅ, 2007). A
recent survey shows that although the actual risk of being a victim
of violent crime in rural areas is similar to that in the rest of
the country (excluding Stockholm), the perceived risk is
significantly lower in rural areas (Swedish National Institute of
Public Health, 2006). Statistics show that there are areas that
despite having demographic and socio-economic challenges ahead, are
coping better than others in preventing crime and disorder as well
as ensuring good levels of perceived safety (SCB database, 2007).
Since crime prevention in Sweden is not centralised and often
adapted to the ‘local realities’ (Gustafsson and Hollari, 2005),
there are reasons to believe that differences in crime prevention
practices are also responsible for the varied crime levels and
perceived safety across the country.
We argue for the
inclusion of crime and fear of crime as important aspects of social
sustainability in Swedish rural areas. Thus, obtaining detailed
knowledge on rural municipalities’ criminogenic conditions and how
they relate to actual crime levels is of fundamental importance in
the debate of social sustainability. This should also include an
assessment of different approaches to prevent crime and ensure
safety in rural communities.
Aim of the project and
specific objectives
The aim
of this project is to assess crime, safety and crime prevention
practices as dimensions of social sustainability in Swedish rural
communities. This will be achieved by:
Expected outcomes
A final seminar in Stockholm
is planned to present findings at the end of the project. We will
present the project findings in a report in Swedish that will be
available on the project’s webpage. We also plan to disseminate
findings in academic conferences during the project. At least three
published articles in international peer-refereed journals summarise
the main project results.
References
BRÅ – Brottsförebyggande
rådet (2007) The Swedish Crime Survey 2006 Victimization, fear of
crime and public confidence in the criminal justice system.
National Council for Crime Prevention, Report 14.
Swedish National Institute
of Public Health (2006) Hälsa på lika villkor. Rapport
2007:01.
Gustafsson, C., Hollari, S.
(2005) On the right track. A survey of Sweden’s local crime
prevention councils. National Council for Crime Prevention,
Report 15.
More information, contact Vânia
Ceccato,
vania@infra.kth.se
Home