 |
Huvudmeny
PFRS Hem
Läro studier
PFRS Filosofi och Metod
Inledning
Sola Scriptura
Andens roll
Tertullianus & PTR Regeln
Irenaeus & PTR Regeln
Klemens & Mathetes
PTR Grfik
PFRS Metodologi visavi:
Östlig Ortodoxi

Main Menu
PFRS Home
Doctrinal
Studies
PFRS
Philosophy and Methodology
Introduction
Sola
Scriptura? The Spirit's
Role Tertullian
& PFR Rule Irenaeus & PFR
Rule Clement &
Mathetes PFR
Graphic
PFRS
Methodology vs:
Eastern
Orthodoxy Wesleyan
Quadrilateral |
 |
|
PFRS
Home > Doctrinal
Studies > Philosophy and
Methodology >
Irenaeus & den Pristina Trosregeln (PTR) Copyright © Tim
Warner - 01/2003
Översatt av Fred Örtegren - 03/2005
Irenaeus verkade före Tertullianus som en av den tidiga Församlingens
apologeter och försvarare av den Pristina Tron mot de gnostiska
heretikerna. Han var föreståndare för församlingen i Lyon, en stad i
Gaul (Frankrike). Irenaeus var en lärjunge till Polycarpus, som i sin tur
hade blivit undervisad av Aposteln Johannes. Han åberopade frekvent till
Apostolisk tradition i sina fyra volymer där han vederlägger
gnostikerna. Liksom Tertullianus såg Irenaeus på överensstämmelsen
mellan de bevarade lärorna från de olika oberoende lokala
församlingarna som bevis för att den kristna tron hade bevarats
intakt. Vi tar här med Irenaeus reflexioner för att illustrera
att ortodoxa kristna skriftställare var överens angående det sätt på
vilket den sanna Apostoliska Tron skulle urskiljas från heresierna som
mångfaldigades under deras tid. Irenaeus skrev några få årtionden
före Tertullianus, och inte så lång tid efter Johannes död. Nedan
har vi kopierat två avsnitt från Irenaeus verk "Mot
heresierna". Ett avsnitt som finns med här har används av Romerskt
Katolska teologer i ett försök att bevisa den Romerska församlingens
överhöghet över andra lokala församlingar. Det större sammanhanget
visar emellertid att Irenaeus inte refererade till Rom som dess
församling på något sätt hade överhöghet över de andra
församlingarna. Han tog enbart Rom som ett exempel bland många möjliga.
Hans uttalande att alla församlingarna med nödvändighet måste vara
samstämmiga med Rom, innebar endast att om varje församling oberoende
hade bevarat den sanna Tron så skulle de teoretiskt också alla
överensstämma med hans exempel, den lokala församlingen i Rom. Hans
slutsats var att de lokala församlingarna, inklusive Rom, var
samstämmiga beträffande den Apostoliska Tron. Den samstämmigheten
bevisade att varje lokal församling bevarat den Tro som överlämnats
till dem av Apostlarna som personligen grundlagt de här församlingarna.
Against
Heresies, Bk I, Chapter X UNITY OF THE FAITH OF THE
CHURCH THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE WORLD
"1. The Church, though dispersed
throughout the whole world, even to the ends of the earth, has received
from the apostles and their disciples this faith: [She believes] in one
God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all
things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who
became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed
through the prophets the dispensations of God, and the advents, and the
birth from a virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead,
and the ascension into heaven in the flesh of the beloved Christ Jesus,
our Lord, and His [future] manifestation from heaven in the glory of the
Father “to gather all things in one,” and to raise up anew all flesh of
the whole human race, in order that to Christ Jesus, our Lord, and God,
and Savior, and King, according to the will of the invisible Father,
“every knee should bow, of things in heaven,, and things in earth, and
things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess” to Him, and
that He should execute just judgment towards all; that He may send
“spiritual wickednesses,” and the angels who transgressed and became
apostates, together with the ungodly, and unrighteous, and wicked, and
profane among men, into everlasting fire; but may, in the exercise of His
grace, confer immortality on the righteous, and holy, and those who have
kept His commandments, and have persevered in His love, some from the
beginning [of their Christian course], and others from [the date of] their
repentance, and may surround them with everlasting glory.
2. As I have already observed, the
Church, having received this preaching and this faith, although scattered
throughout the whole world, yet, as if occupying but one house, carefully
preserves it. She also believes these points [of doctrine] just as if she
had but one soul, and one and the same heart, and she proclaims them, and
teaches them, and hands them down, with perfect harmony, as if she
possessed only one mouth. For, although the languages of the world are
dissimilar, yet the import of the tradition is one and the same. For the
Churches which have been planted in Germany do not believe or hand down
anything different, nor do those in Spain, nor those in Gaul, nor those in
the East, nor those in Egypt, nor those in Libya, nor those which have
been established in the central regions of the world. But as the sun, that
creature of God, is one and the same throughout the whole world, so also
the preaching of the truth shineth everywhere, and enlightens all men that
are willing to come to a knowledge of the truth. Nor will any one of the
rulers in the Churches, however highly gifted he may be in point of
eloquence, teach doctrines different from these (for no one is greater
than the Master); nor, on the other hand, will he who is deficient in
power of expression inflict injury on the tradition. For the faith being
ever one and the same, neither does one who is able at great length to
discourse regarding it, make any addition to it, nor does one, who can say
but little diminish it. 3. It does not follow because men are endowed with greater and
less degrees of intelligence, that they should therefore change the
subject-matter [of the faith] itself, and should conceive of some other
God besides Him who is the Framer, Maker, and Preserver of this universe,
(as if He were not sufficient for them), or of another Christ, or another
Only-begotten. But the fact referred to simply implies this, that one may
[more accurately than another] bring out the meaning of those things which
have been spoken in parables, and accommodate them to the general scheme
of the faith; and explain [with special clearness] the operation and
dispensation of God connected with human salvation; and show that God
manifested longsuffering in regard to the apostasy of the angels who
transgressed, as also with respect to the disobedience of men; and set
forth why it is that one and the same God has made some things temporal
and some eternal, some heavenly and others earthly; and understand for
what reason God, though invisible, manifested Himself to the prophets not
under one form, but differently to different individuals; and show why it
was that more covenants than one were given to mankind; and teach what was
the special character of each of these covenants; and search out for what
reason “God hath concluded every man in unbelief, that He may have mercy
upon all;” and gratefully describe on what account the Word of God became
flesh and suffered; and relate why the advent of the Son of God took place
in these last times, that is, in the end, rather than in the beginning [of
the world]; and unfold what is contained in the scriptures concerning the
end [itself], and things to come; and not be silent as to how it is that
God has made the Gentiles, whose salvation was despaired of, fellow-heirs,
and of the same body, and partakers with the saints; and discourse how it
is that “this mortal body shall put on immortality, and this corruptible
shall put on incorruption;” and proclaim in what sense [God] says, “‘That
is a people who was not a people; and she is beloved who was not beloved;”
and in what sense He says that “more are the children of her that was
desolate, than of her who possessed a husband.” For in reference to these
points, and others of a like nature, the apostle exclaims: “Oh! the depth
of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God; how unsearchable
are His judgments, and His ways past finding out!” But [the superior skill
spoken of] is not found in this, that any one should, beyond the Creator
and Framer [of the world], conceive of the Enthymesis of an erring Aeon,
their mother and his, and should thus proceed to such a pitch of
blasphemy; nor does it consist in this, that he should again falsely
imagine, as being above this [fancied being], a Pleroma at one time
supposed to contain thirty, and at another time an innumerable tribe of
Aeons, as these teachers who are destitute of truly divine wisdom
maintain; while the Catholic Church possesses one and the same faith
throughout the whole world, as we have already said."
Against
Heresies, Bk. III, Chapter III A REFUTATION OF THE
HERETICS, FROM THE FACT THAT, IN THE VARIOUS CHURCHES, A PERPETUAL
SUCCESSION OF BISHOPS WAS KEPT UP
"1. It is within the power of all,
therefore, in every Church, who may wish to see the truth, to contemplate
clearly the tradition of the apostles manifested throughout the whole
world; and we are in a position to reckon up those who were by the
apostles instituted bishops in the Churches, and [to demonstrate] the
succession of these men to our own times; those who neither taught nor
knew of anything like what these [heretics] rave about. For if the
apostles had known hidden mysteries, which they were in the habit of
imparting to “the perfect” apart and privily from the rest, they would
have delivered them especially to those to whom they were also committing
the Churches themselves. For they were desirous that these men should be
very perfect and blameless in all things, whom also they were leaving
behind as their successors, delivering up their own place of government to
these men; which men, if they discharged their functions honestly, would
be a great boon [to the Church], but if they should fall away, the direst
calamity. 2. Since,
however, it would be very tedious, in such a volume as this, to reckon up
the successions of all the Churches, we do put to confusion all those who,
in whatever manner, whether by an evil self-pleasing, by vainglory, or by
blindness and perverse opinion, assemble in unauthorized meetings; [we do
this, I say,] by indicating that tradition derived from the apostles, of
the very great, the very ancient, and universally known Church founded and
organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul; as
also [by pointing out] the faith preached to men, which comes down to our
time by means of the successions of the bishops. For it is a matter of
necessity that every Church should agree with this Church, on account of
its pre- eminent authority, that is, the faithful everywhere, inasmuch as
the apostolical tradition has been preserved continuously by those
[faithful men] who exist everywhere. [1] 3.
The blessed apostles, then, having founded and built up the Church,
committed into the hands of Linus the office of the episcopate. Of this
Linus, Paul makes mention in the Epistles to Timothy. To him succeeded
Anacletus; and after him, in the third place from the apostles, Clement
was allotted the bishopric. This man, as he had seen the blessed apostles,
and had been conversant with them, might be said to have the preaching of
the apostles still echoing [in his ears], and their traditions before his
eyes. Nor was he alone [in this], for there were many still remaining who
had received instructions from the apostles. In the time of this Clement,
no small dissension having occurred among the brethren at Corinth, the
Church in Rome despatched a most powerful letter to the Corinthians,
exhorting them to peace, renewing their faith, and declaring the tradition
which it had lately received from the apostles, proclaiming the one God,
omnipotent, the Maker of heaven and earth, the Creator of man, who brought
on the deluge, and called Abraham, who led the people from the land of
Egypt, spake with Moses, set forth the law, sent the prophets, and who has
prepared fire for the devil and his angels. From this document, whosoever
chooses to do so, may learn that He, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,
was preached by the Churches, and may also understand the apostolical
tradition of the Church, since this Epistle is of older date than these
men who are now propagating falsehood, and who conjure into existence
another God beyond the Creator and the Maker of all existing things. To
this Clement there succeeded Evaristus. Alexander followed Evaristus;
then, sixth from the apostles, Sixtus was appointed; after him,
Telephorus, who was gloriously martyred; then Hyginus; after him, Pius;
then after him, Anicetus. Sorer having succeeded Anicetus, Eleutherius
does now, in the twelfth place from the apostles, hold the inheritance of
the episcopate. In this order, and by this succession, the ecclesiastical
tradition from the apostles, and the preaching of the truth, have come
down to us. And this is most abundant proof that there is one and the same
vivifying faith, which has been preserved in the Church from the apostles
until now, and handed down in truth. 4. But Polycarp also was not only instructed by
apostles, and conversed with many who had seen Christ, but was also, by
apostles in Asia, appointed bishop of the Church in Smyrna, whom I also
saw in my early youth, for he tarried [on earth] a very long time, and,
when a very old man, gloriously and most nobly suffering martyrdom,
departed this life, having always taught the things which he had learned
from the apostles, and which the Church has handed down, and which alone
are true. To these things all the Asiatic Churches testify, as do also
those men who have succeeded Polycarp down to the present time, — a man
who was of much greater weight, and a more steadfast witness of truth,
than Valentinus, and Marcion, and the rest of the heretics. He it was who,
coming to Rome in the time of Anicetus caused many to turn away from the
aforesaid heretics to the Church of God, proclaiming that he had received
this one and sole truth from the apostles, — that, namely, which is handed
down by the Church. There are also those who heard from him that John, the
disciple of the Lord, going to bathe at Ephesus, and perceiving Cerinthus
within, rushed out of the bath-house without bathing, exclaiming, “Let us
fly, lest even the bath-house fall down, because Cerinthus, the enemy of
the truth, is within.” And Polycarp himself replied to Marcion, who met
him on one occasion, and said, “Dost thou know me?” “I do know thee, the
first-born of Satan.” Such was the horror which the apostles and their
disciples had against holding even verbal communication with any
corrupters of the truth; as Paul also says, “A man that is an heretic,
after the first and second admonition, reject; knowing that he that is
such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.” There is also
a very powerful Epistle of Polycarp written to the Philippians, from which
those who choose to do so, and are anxious about their salvation, can
learn the character of his faith, and the preaching of the truth. Then,
again, the Church in Ephesus, founded by Paul, and having John remaining
among them permanently until the times of Trajan, is a true witness of the
tradition of the apostles."
Chapter
IV THE TRUTH IS TO BE FOUND NOWHERE ELSE BUT IN
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, THE SOLE DEPOSITORY OF APOSTOLICAL DOCTRINE. HERESIES
ARE OF RECENT FORMATION, AND CANNOT TRACE THEIR ORIGIN UP TO THE
APOSTLES
"1. Since therefore we have such
proofs, it is not necessary to seek the truth among others which it is
easy to obtain from the Church; since the apostles, like a rich man
[depositing his money] in a bank, lodged in her hands most copiously all
things pertaining to the truth: so that every man, whosoever will, can
draw from her the water of life. For she is the entrance to life; all
others are thieves and robbers. On this account are we bound to avoid
them, but to make choice of the thing pertaining to the Church with the
utmost diligence, and to lay hold of the tradition of the truth. For how
stands the case? Suppose there arise a dispute relative to some important
question among us, should we not have recourse to the most ancient
Churches with which the apostles held constant intercourse, and learn from
them what is certain and clear in regard to the present question? For how
should it be if the apostles themselves had not left us writings? Would it
not be necessary, [in that case,] to follow the course of the tradition
which they handed down to those to whom they did commit the
Churches? 2. To which
course many nations of those barbarians who believe in Christ do assent,
having salvation written in their hearts by the Spirit, without paper or
ink, and, carefully preserving the ancient tradition, believing in one
God, the Creator of heaven and earth, and all things therein, by means of
Christ Jesus, the Son of God; who, because of His surpassing love towards
His creation, condescended to be born of the virgin, He Himself uniting
man through Himself to God, and having suffered under Pontius Pilate, and
rising again, and having been received up in splendor, shall come in
glory, the Savior of those who are saved, and the Judge of those who are
judged, and sending into eternal fire those who transform the truth, and
despise His Father and His advent. Those who, in the absence of written
documents, have believed this faith, are barbarians, so far as regards our
language; but as regards doctrine, manner, and tenor of life, they are,
because of faith, very wise indeed; and they do please God, ordering their
conversation in all righteousness, chastity, and wisdom. If any one were
to preach to these men the inventions of the heretics, speaking to them in
their own language, they would at once stop their ears, and flee as far
off as possible, not enduring even to listen to the blasphemous address.
Thus, by means of that ancient tradition of the apostles, they do not
suffer their mind to conceive anything of the [doctrines suggested by the]
portentous language of these teachers, among whom neither Church nor
doctrine has ever been established. 3. For, prior to Valentinus, those who follow
Valentinus had no existence; nor did those from Marcion exist before
Marcion; nor, in short, had any of those malignant-minded people, whom I
have above enumerated, any being previous to the initiators and inventors
of their perversity. For Valentinus came to Rome in the time of Hyginus,
flourished under Pius, and remained until Anicetus. Cerdon, too, Marcion’s
predecessor, himself arrived in the time of Hyginus, who was the ninth
bishop. Coming frequently into the Church, and making public confession,
he thus remained, one time teaching in secret, and then again making
public confession; but at last, having been denounced for corrupt
teaching, he was excommunicated from the assembly of the brethren.
Marcion, then, succeeding him, flourished under Anicetus, who held the
tenth place of the episcopate. But the rest, who are called Gnostics, take
rise from Menander, Simon’s disciple, as I have shown; and each one of
them appeared to be both the father and the high priest of that doctrine
into which he has been initiated. But all these (the Marcosians) broke out
into their apostasy much later, even during the intermediate period of the
Church."
Chapter
XII DOCTRINE OF THE REST OF THE
APOSTLES
Can it really be, that Peter was not
at that time as yet in possession of the perfect knowledge which these men
discovered afterwards? According to them, therefore, Peter was imperfect,
and the rest of the apostles were imperfect; and so it would be fitting
that they, coming to life again, should become disciples of these men, in
order that they too might be made perfect. But this is truly ridiculous.
These men, in fact, are proved to be not disciples of the apostles, but of
their own wicked notions. To this cause also are due the various opinions
which exist among them, inasmuch as each one adopted error just as he was
capable [of embracing it]. But the Church throughout all the world, having
its origin firm from the apostles, perseveres in one and the same opinion
with regard to God and His Son."
Against
Heresies, Book V, Chapter XXXIII WHOSOEVER CONFESSES THAT
ONE GOD IS THE AUTHOR OF BOTH TESTAMENTS, AND DILIGENTLY READS THE
SCRIPTURES IN COMPANY WITH THE PRESBYTERS OF THE CHURCH, IS A TRUE
SPIRITUAL DISCIPLE; AND HE WILL RIGHTLY UNDERSTAND AND INTERPRET ALL THAT
THE PROPHETS HAVE DECLARED RESPECTING CHRIST AND THE LIBERTY OF THE NEW
TESTAMENT
"8. True knowledge is the doctrine
of the apostles, and the ancient constitution of the Church throughout
all the world, and the distinctive manifestation of the body of Christ
according to the successions of the bishops, by which they have
handed down that Church which exists in every place, and has come even
unto us, being guarded and preserved without any forging of Scriptures, by
a very complete system of doctrine, and neither receiving addition
nor curtailment; and reading without falsification, and a lawful and
diligent exposition in harmony with the Scriptures, both without danger
and without blasphemy; and the pre-eminent gift of love, which is more
precious than knowledge, more glorious than prophecy, and which excels all
the other gifts."
Against
Heresies, Bk. V, Preface
"IN the four preceding books, my very
dear friend, which I put forth to thee, all the heretics have been
exposed, and their doctrines brought to light, and these men refuted who
have devised irreligious opinions. [I have accomplished this by adducing]
something from the doctrine peculiar to each of these men, which they have
left in their writings, as well as by using arguments of a more general
nature, and applicable to them all. Then I have pointed out the truth, and
shown the preaching of the Church, which the prophets proclaimed (as I
have already demonstrated), but which Christ brought to perfection, and
the apostles have handed down, from whom the Church, receiving [these
truths], and throughout all the world alone preserving them in their
integrity, has transmitted them to her sons."
Notes: [1] This passage is often quoted by Roman
Catholic apologists in support of the alleged Roman church's supremacy and
Apostolic succession. But the context clearly indicates that Irenaeus
viewed the Roman church as just one of many equals. He used the Roman
church as one example from among many. His point was that there was a
succession of bishops in each of the local churches who preserved the
Apostolic teachings. The succession of Roman bishops Irenaeus listed were
illustrative of what occurred in each of the local Apostolic churches. It
was the agreement of all of the Apostolic churches on which Irenaeus
placed the weight of his appeal to Apostolic authority.

Gå till original

EasyCounter
Gå till Freds hemsida
|
 |